COLEMAN v. DANFORTH et al

Filing 91

ORDER ADOPTING 86 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 80 Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/21/2017. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION

COREY LEWIS COLEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM DANFORTH, et al.,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-267(MTT)

ORDER
United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying the
Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Doc. 86. The Plaintiff has objected. Doc.
90. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered the
Plaintiff’s objections and made a de novo determination of the portions of the
Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the
Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and
made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 21st day of September, 2017.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT