COLEMAN v. DANFORTH et al
ORDER ADOPTING 86 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 80 Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/21/2017. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COREY LEWIS COLEMAN,
WILLIAM DANFORTH, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-267(MTT)
United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying the
Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Doc. 86. The Plaintiff has objected. Doc.
90. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered the
Plaintiff’s objections and made a de novo determination of the portions of the
Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the
Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and
made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 21st day of September, 2017.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?