WILLIAMS v. GLOVER et al
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs claims for equitable relief and the claims against Bearden and McLaughlin are DISMISSED. Bearden and McLaughlin are DISMISSED as Defendants in this action. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/15/2016. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
JEROME WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEOFFRY GLOVER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-446(MTT)
ORDER
After screening the Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A,
United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles ordered the claim against Defendant
Geoffrey Glover to proceed but recommends dismissing the Plaintiff’s claims for
equitable relief and dismissing Defendants Sergeant Casey Bearden and Warden
Gregory McLaughlin. (Doc. 5). The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation.1
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the
findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The
Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court. Accordingly, the
Plaintiff’s claims for equitable relief and the claims against Bearden and McLaughlin are
DISMISSED. Bearden and McLaughlin are DISMISSED as Defendants in this action.
SO ORDERED, this the 15th day of January, 2016.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
On December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a letter to the Court stating that on December 15, 2015, he
received a document from the Court which was dated December 8, 2015. This is the date the Magistrate
Judge’s Order and Recommendation was entered. (Doc. 8). Assuming the Plaintiff did not receive the
Recommendation until December 15, 2015, the Court calculated the Plaintiff’s time to object from this
date.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?