HOUSTON DENTAL PROFESSIONALS PC et al v. VASKO

Filing 39

ORDER TERMINATING 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; TERMINATING 17 Motion to Dismiss. Joseph Sumrall shall file a pleading in response to Vaskos claims within fourteen days unless relieved of that obligation by the Superior Court of Houston County. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/2/2017. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION HOUSTON DENTAL PROFESSIONALS P.C., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFREY T. VASKO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-109(MTT) ORDER Plaintiffs Houston Dental Professionals, P.C. and Joseph T. Sumrall, Jr. have moved to dismiss some of Defendant Jeffrey T. Vasko’s counterclaims. Doc. 6. Counterclaim Defendant Joseph G. Sumrall has moved, primarily pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens, to dismiss Vasko’s claims against him in their entirety. Joseph Sumrall’s motion is based on forum selection clauses contained in the various agreements among the parties. The parties have stipulated to the remand of this entire action to the Superior Court of Houston County. Accordingly, the motions to dismiss are TERMINATED. Joseph Sumrall shall file a pleading in response to Vasko’s claims within fourteen days unless relieved of that obligation by the Superior Court of Houston County. SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of February, 2017. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?