RIDLEY v. CONLEY

Filing 14

ORDER OVERRULING 11 Petitioner's response and objection and DENYING 7 , 8 , 9 wkhich are collectively construed as a Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 12/12/2016. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION

EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY,
Petitioner
VS.
Warden CONLEY,
Respondent.
________________________________

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL NO. 5:16-CV-0172-MTT-MSH

ORDER
Currently before the Court is Petitioner’s response and objection (ECF No. 11) to
the Court’s August 23, 2016, Order (ECF No. 10) granting his motion for reconsideration
but dismissing his habeas petition on other grounds.

The same order also denied

Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See id.
The Court has now read and considered the objections raised in Petitioner’s
response and finds no valid basis for reconsideration. Petitioner’s response simply repeats
the same arguments previously addressed by the Court and rejected on the merits.
Petitioner’s repeated insistence that he was deprived of his right of due process when the
State of Florida placed him on its sex offender registry further has no bearing on this
Court’s conclusion that Petitioner’s claims were unexhausted and duplicative.1 See id.

Petitioner has another case pending in this Court in which he raises the same or similar
arguments. See Ridley v. Conley, 1:16-cv-108-LJA-TQL, Amend. Pet., ECF No. 16 (MD.
Ga. Sept. 6, 2016).

1

Petitioner’s Objection is thus OVERRULED, and his request for Reconsideration
is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 12th day of December, 2016.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2