FREEMAN v. HOTEL EQUITIES INC

Filing 7

ORDER: Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Because the Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged an ADEA retaliation claim, the Court ORDERS that the United States Marshal serve a copy of the complaint and supplemental complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/23/2016. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION MARCUS M. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. HOTEL EQUITIES INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-250 (MTT) ORDER On July 28, 2016, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. 5). The Plaintiff asserted a retaliation claim pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and what appeared to be a hostile work environment claim. The Court allowed the Plaintiff’s ADEA retaliation claim to go forward but concluded that his allegations were insufficient to state a hostile work environment claim. (Id. at 3). The Court ordered the Plaintiff to recast his complaint if he wished to assert a hostile work environment claim. (Id.). On August 6, 2016, the Plaintiff supplemented his complaint with additional allegations. However, after screening the Plaintiff’s supplemental allegations, the Court concludes that the allegations underlying the alleged hostile work environment claim are still insufficient to state a claim. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Because the Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged an ADEA retaliation claim, the Court ORDERS that the United States Marshal serve a copy of the complaint and supplemental complaint. SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of August, 2016. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?