FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING without prejudice 1 Commplaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 10/25/2016. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION RODERICK FRANK FOSTER, : : Plaintiff, : : VS. : : STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., : : Defendants. : ________________________________ : NO. 5:16-CV-309-MTT ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff RODERICK FRANK FOSTER, a prisoner at Central State Prison in Macon, Georgia, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). Although he moved to proceed in forma pauperis, he failed to include a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement. (Doc. 2). The Court, therefore, ordered Plaintiff to either pay the $400.00 filing fee or submit a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to respond. As a result, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s previous Order. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff was given twenty-one days from September 19, 2016 to respond. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has again failed to respond. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 because of his 1 Although difficult to decipher, it appears that Plaintiff is alleging he was denied access to the courts in May 2016 when Bibb County Superior Court Judge Howard Simms and others caused his timely motion for reconsideration to be untimely filed in the Georgia Supreme Court. (Doc. 1 at 5-6). Thus, the applicable two-year statute of limitations failure to comply with the Court’s Orders. SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2016. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT would not prevent Plaintiff from re-filing this action should he so desire. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?