FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING without prejudice 1 Commplaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 10/25/2016. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
RODERICK FRANK FOSTER,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
VS.
:
:
STATE OF GEORGIA, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
________________________________ :
NO. 5:16-CV-309-MTT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff RODERICK FRANK FOSTER, a prisoner at Central State Prison in
Macon, Georgia, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1).
Although he moved to proceed in forma pauperis, he failed to include a certified copy of
his prison trust fund account statement. (Doc. 2). The Court, therefore, ordered Plaintiff
to either pay the $400.00 filing fee or submit a certified copy of his prison trust fund
account statement. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to respond. As a result, the Court ordered
Plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the
Court’s previous Order. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff was given twenty-one days from September
19, 2016 to respond. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has again failed to respond.
Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 because of his
1
Although difficult to decipher, it appears that Plaintiff is alleging he was denied access to
the courts in May 2016 when Bibb County Superior Court Judge Howard Simms and
others caused his timely motion for reconsideration to be untimely filed in the Georgia
Supreme Court. (Doc. 1 at 5-6). Thus, the applicable two-year statute of limitations
failure to comply with the Court’s Orders.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2016.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
would not prevent Plaintiff from re-filing this action should he so desire.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?