Filing 11

ORDER Granting leave to proceed IFP and Dismissing this action without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 12/22/16. (lap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ANDRE D. LIGHTFOOT, Plaintiff, VS. LIEUTENANT RIDLEY, et al., Defendants. ________________________________ : : : : : : : : : NO. 5:16-CV-0338-CAR-MSH ORDER This case is currently before the Court due to Plaintiff’s repeated failure to comply with the Court’s order that he (1) either pay the required fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis1 and also (2) recast his complaint as instructed on a standard form. See Order, ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was originally given twenty-one days to comply with this order and warned that a failure to comply could result in the dismissal of his complaint. Id. The time allowed for compliance nonetheless expired without any response from Plaintiff; and the United States Magistrate Judge has since ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his lawsuit should not be dismissed for his failure to comply. See Order, ECF No. 9. The time for filing a response to the Show Cause Order has now passed. Plaintiff has not yet complied with the original order or otherwise responded with good cause for his failure to comply. Plaintiff only filed a motion for transfer. See ECF No. 10. This motion is not a response to the Court’s orders. 1 Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED solely for the purpose of dismissal. For these reasons, and because it does not appear that the relevant two-year statute of limitations will bar Plaintiff’s from refiling claims, 2 his complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to comply and diligently prosecute his case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t, 205 F. App’x 802, 802 (11th Cir. 2006) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.”). SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2016. S/ C. Ashley Royal C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 According to his complaint, Plaintiff’s claims arise out of events that occurred on or after June 10, 2016. In the State of Georgia, § 1983 claims have a two year statute of limitations. See Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 236 (1989), (citing Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 (1985)); O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33 (1982). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?