RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al

Filing 118

ORDER REJECTING 112 Objection filed by HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR and AFFIRMING 106 Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/21/2018. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-10 (MTT)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER
Plaintiff Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. has filed an “Objection/Response” to United
States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s Order (Doc. 106) denying his motion to
appoint counsel (Doc. 95). Doc. 112. The Court construes this as an objection
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). The Court has considered the
objection and finds Rodriguez has not established that the Magistrate Judge’s rulings
were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(A) (“A [district court may reconsider any pretrial matter . . . where it has
been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”).
Accordingly, Rodriguez’s objection (Doc. 112) is REJECTED and the Magistrate
Judge’s Order (Doc. 106) is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED, this the 21st day of March, 2018.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT