RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al

Filing 155

ORDER REJECTING 136 Plaintiff's Objection to 129 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Amend/Correct and AFFIRMING 129 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Amend/Correct, and TERMINATING as moot 154 Motion request for District Court Review. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 7/18/2018. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-10 (MTT)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER
Plaintiff Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr., has filed an “Objection In Opposition” to United
States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s Order (Doc. 129) denying his motion to
amend (Doc. 113). Doc. 136. The Court construes this as an objection pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). The Court has considered the objection and
finds Rodriguez has not established that the Magistrate Judge’s rulings were clearly
erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A) (“A [district court may reconsider any pretrial matter . . . where it has been
shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”).
Accordingly, Rodriguez’s objection (Doc. 136) is REJECTED and the Magistrate
Judge’s Order (Doc. 129) is AFFIRMED. Further, Rodriguez’s motion requesting that
the Court review his objection (Doc. 154) is TERMINATED as moot.
SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of July, 2018.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT