OWENS v. WATERS et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Defendants WILLIAMS, INGRAM, STUBBS, WEST, and SHAFER, those Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As set forth in the Order and Recommendation, Plaintiff's remaining claims may proceed forward. Ordered by US DISTRICT C. ASHLEY ROYAL on 11/9/2017. (tlh) Text Modified on 11/9/2017 (tlh).
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
JAMES OWENS, III,
LYNN WATERS, et al.,
ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Currently before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge to allow Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical
care claims against Defendants Waters, Ranson, Sprague, Haynie, Stines, Jackson,
Brown, Smith, and Everidge, and Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against
Defendant McDuffie to proceed; and to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s Fourteenth
Amendment claims against Defendants Williams, Ingram, Stubbs, West, and Shafer for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an
objection to the Recommendation. This Court agrees with the findings and conclusions
of the Order and Recommendation, and thus, it [Doc. 7] is ADOPTED AND MADE
THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Because Plaintiff fails to state a claim against
Defendants WILLIAMS, INGRAM, STUBBS, WEST, and SHAFER, those Defendants are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As set forth in the Order and Recommendation,
Plaintiff’s remaining claims may proceed forward.
SO ORDERED, this 9th day of November, 2017.
S/ C. Ashley Royal
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?