JACKSON v. BISHOP et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Motion for TRO. Plaintiffs deliberate indifference to safety claim against Defendant William Powell is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's remaining claims may proceed forward. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 11/9/2017. (tlh)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
MIGUEL JACKSON,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
Civil Action
:
No. 5:17‐cv‐325‐CAR‐MSH
v.
:
:
JUNE BISHOP, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
_____________________________________
ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Currently before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference
to safety claim against Defendant William Powell for failure to state a claim, and to
deny Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order for
failure to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Plaintiff has not filed an
objection to the Recommendation. This Court agrees with the findings and conclusions
of the Order and Recommendation, and thus, it [Doc. 11] is ADOPTED AND MADE
THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference to safety claim
against Defendant William Powell is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and
Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order [Doc.
5] is DENIED. As set forth in the Order and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s remaining
claims may proceed forward.
SO ORDERED, this 9th day of November, 2017.
SSH
S/ C. Ashley Royal
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?