GIBSON v. BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. Gibson's First Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and Edwards shall proceed for further factual development. Gibson's remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/8/2018. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION DEWAYNE ONEAL GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-423 (MTT) ORDER Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and § 1915(e), United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle has conducted a screening of Plaintiff Dewayne Oneal Gibson’s complaint and recommends that Gibson’s access to courts claim against Defendants Sergeant Scott Crosby and Lieutenant Paul Edwards and his claims against Defendants Bibb County Law Enforcement be dismissed. Doc. 7 at 1, 6-7. But the Magistrate Judge recommends Gibson’s First Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and Edwards should proceed for further factual development. Id. Gibson has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Gibson’s First Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and Edwards shall proceed for further factual development. Gibson’s remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED, this 8th day of March, 2018. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?