GIBSON v. BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. Gibson's First Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and Edwards shall proceed for further factual development. Gibson's remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/8/2018. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DEWAYNE ONEAL GIBSON,
BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT
CENTER, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-423 (MTT)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and § 1915(e), United States Magistrate Judge
Charles H. Weigle has conducted a screening of Plaintiff Dewayne Oneal Gibson’s
complaint and recommends that Gibson’s access to courts claim against Defendants
Sergeant Scott Crosby and Lieutenant Paul Edwards and his claims against Defendants
Bibb County Law Enforcement be dismissed. Doc. 7 at 1, 6-7. But the Magistrate
Judge recommends Gibson’s First Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and
Edwards should proceed for further factual development. Id. Gibson has not objected
to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and adopts the
findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The
Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Gibson’s First
Amendment free speech claims against Crosby and Edwards shall proceed for further
factual development. Gibson’s remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED, this 8th day of March, 2018.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?