KERSHAW v. WHITE et al

Filing 78

ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 53 Motion for Summary Judgment(); adopting 77 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 11/26/2019. (hmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION LANCE KERSHAW, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff BRAD WHITE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-CV-186 (MTT) ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends granting Defendants Peter Wrobel, Nancy Roswell, and Southern Correction Medicine’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 51) 1 and denying Plaintiff Lance Kershaw’s motion for access to the law library (Doc. 64). Docs. 77. Kershaw has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The Recommendation (Doc. 77) is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 51) is GRANTED, and Kershaw’s claims against the Defendants (Doc. 7) are DISMISSED without prejudice. Additionally, Kershaw’s motion for access to the law library (Doc. 64) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 26th day of November, 2018. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE 1 Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 53) or, in the alternative, granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 51). The Court adopts the Recommendation on the motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust. Doc. 77 at 17−20. Accordingly, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 53) is DENIED as moot. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?