Filing 68

ORDER finding as moot 66 Motion for Review of Civil Procedure Transcripts and Recordings of Defendant's Deposition on Plaintiff; granting 67 Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions (Dispositive motions due by 9/28/2022.) Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 7/29/2022. (ggs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION JARRETT DIXON, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH MAPP, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 5:21-cv-368-MTT-CHW Proceedings under 42. U.S.C. § 1983 Before the U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for extension of time to file dispositive motions. (Doc. 67). Defendant explains that Plaintiff’s time for reviewing his deposition transcript will not be complete until the current dispositive motion deadline passes. Therefore, Defendant requests an extension of time to allow the final transcript to be prepared before any dispositive motions are due. Defendant’s motion for extension of time to file dispositive motions (Doc. 67) is GRANTED. Dispositive motions are due on or before September 28, 2022. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to be provided with and to review the transcript of his deposition. (Doc. 66). Defendant stated the transcript has been forwarded to Plaintiff for review. (Doc. 67, p. 2, ¶ 5). Therefore, there is no further action for the Court to take regarding Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff’s motion to review transcripts (Doc. 66) is DISMISSED as moot. SO ORDERED, this 29th day of July, 2022. s/ Charles H. Weigle Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?