BURROUGHS et al v. HILL et al
ORDER Denying 42 MOTION for Extension of Time to File OBJECTION as to 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 Amended Complaint/Petition filed by TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS and Striking 41 Objection to Report and Recommendations, filed by TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 05/19/2023. (elp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
FNU HILL, et al.,
On May 19, 2023, Plaintiff Torres Burroughs “filed” Objections [Doc. 41] to the
magistrate judge’s Recommendation, along with a Motion for Extension of Time to File
Objections [Doc. 42]. However, both documents were signed by someone other than
Plaintiff. See [Doc. 41, p. 4 (signed “by POA”)]; [Doc. 42 (same)]. Even more, the filings
were mailed from “S. Burroughs” at 6 Mossy Court, “Sav’h, GA” 31419. [Doc. 41-10].
Plaintiff, however, is currently housed at Wilcox State Prison in Abbeville, Georgia.
[Doc. 35]; [Doc. 36].
It is black-letter law that a non-lawyer cannot represent someone in a legal
proceeding. That includes those purporting to act under power of attorney. Jacox v.
Dep’t of Def., No. 5:06CV182 HL, 2007 WL 118102, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 10, 2007) (“By its
own terms [28 U.S.C.] § 1654 requires those persons who seek to represent themselves
in federal courts to do so ‘personally,’ thereby foreclosing on the possibility that such
representation could occur by proxy.”); Brown v. Great N. Ins. Co., No. 2:14-CV-00015RWS, 2015 WL 898357, at *10 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 3, 2015) (“Consequently, the existence of a
power of attorney does not authorize a non-lawyer to conduct legal proceedings on
behalf of a pro se litigant[.]”). Further, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires each
pleading filed in a federal court to be signed personally by the party representing
themselves. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Rule 11 further instructs courts to strike a document that
is improperly signed. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s Objections [Doc. 41].
As to Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections, the Court
previously granted Plaintiff additional time to file his objections. See [Doc. 40 (extending
the deadline for objections to May 29, 2023)]. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff
Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 42]. Plaintiff must file any objections on or before
May 29, 2023.
SO ORDERED, this 19th day of May, 2023.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?