Wood et al v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al

Filing 390

ORDER finding as moot 224 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 234 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 244 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 245 Motion to Compel; denying 249 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 255 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 259 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 267 Motion to Quash; granting 268 Motion to Quash; granting 269 Motion to Quash; finding as moot 280 Sealed Motion; withdrawing 281 Sealed Motion; withdrawing 283 Motion for Pro tective Order; finding as moot 287 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 289 Motion for Hearing; withdrawing 295 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 297 Sealed Motion; denying 312 Motion to Quash; denying 322 Motion to Strike ; denying [32 4] Motion for Protective Order; denying 336 Motion to Strike ; granting 345 Sealed Motion; finding as moot 351 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; finding as moot 364 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 386 Motion for Leave to File. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/18/2009. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION MARK G. WOOD, M.D., Plaintiff, v. ARCHBOLD MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : :

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-109-HL

ORDER
On June 17, 2009 this Court held a hearing to discuss all outstanding motions. Pursuant to the rulings made at the hearing, the following motions are DISMISSED as moot: Motion to Compel Compliance With the Subpoena Issued to Renex Dialysis Clinic of South Georgia, Inc. (Doc. 224); Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Data From Nephrology Consultants, Inc., P.C. (Doc. 234); Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Mark G. Wood for Deposition (Doc. 244); Motion to Compel Emergency Motion to Compel the Deposition of Plaintiff Mark G. Wood (Doc. 245); Motion for Extension of Time to File Consent Motion to Extend Time (Doc. 255); Motion for Extension of Time to File Corrected Consent Motion to Extend Time (Doc. 259); Motion to Compel Production of Corporate Defendants' Investigation Report of Sellers (Doc. 280); Motion to Compel Non-Party Accounting Firms' Production Requested in Subpoenas (Doc.

287); Motion for Hearing (Doc. 289); Motion for Leave for File Excess Pages (Doc. 351); Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (Doc. 364); Motion for Leave to File Motion for Sanctions Based on Plaintiff's Counsel's Violation of Rule 11 (Doc. 386). The following motions are DENIED: Motion to Compel (Doc. 249); Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued to Georgia Department of Community Health and Office of Rural Affairs and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 312); Motion to Strike (Doc. 322); Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 324); Motion to Strike (Doc. 336). The following motions are GRANTED: Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-Party Accounting Firms (Doc. 267); Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-Party Accounting Firms (Doc. 268); Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Lanigan & Associates (Doc. 269); Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and its Accompanying Exhibit (Doc. 297); Motion to Substitute Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 345). The following motions are WITHDRAWN: Motion to Overrule Hospital Defendants' Confidential Designation of Defendant Simms' Deposition (Doc. 281); Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 283); Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to Requests for Admission (Doc. 295) In regards to Defendant Beverly's Motion in Limine regarding Supposed

Wrongdoing Outside the Statute of Limitations (Doc. 330), Plaintiff's counsel shall have ten (10) days to re-brief the matter. Defendants' shall have five (5) days to file responses. Briefs shall the limited to ten (10) pages. As stated at the hearing, Plaintiff is required to submit to no more than two and half days of deposition. Said deposition shall be at a time and place agreed upon by Counsel. SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of June, 2009.

/s/ Hugh Lawson

HUGH LAWSON, Judge
wj c