B& F System, Inc. v. LeBlanc et al
Filing
194
ORDER directing parties to file briefs not later than 8/22/2011. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/16/2011. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
THE B & F SYSTEM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 7:07-CV-192 (HL)
v.
LLOYD J. LEBLANC JR., ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Several claims in this case rise out of the Maxam Independent Distributor
Agreement entered into between The B & F System, Inc. and Lloyd LeBlanc on
November 21, 1986. Paragraph 23C of the MIDA reads as follows:
CHOICE OF LAW. It is the intention of the parties that the
laws of Texas should govern the validity of this
Agreement, and construction of its terms, and the
interpretation of the rights and duties of the parties, and all
obligations of the parties created hereunder are
performable in Dallas County, Texas.
While both parties filed motions for summary judgment, neither party relied on
Texas law, and instead analyzed all of their claims under Georgia law. However,
neither party explained why Texas law should not apply to this case. The parties are
to present their positions on this choice of law issue to the Court, namely whether
Texas law or Georgia law should apply to claims relating to the MIDA, in a brief
which includes case citations and authorities. The brief may not exceed five pages,
and must be filed on or before August 22, 2011.
Alternatively, the parties may agree as to what state’s law should apply to this
case. If the parties so agree, they are to inform the Court in writing as to that
agreement on or before August 22, 2011.
SO ORDERED, this 16th day of August, 2011.
s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?