B& F System, Inc. v. LeBlanc et al
Filing
341
Final Judgment. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 7/10/2012. (nbp) Modified text on 7/10/2012 (rlw).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
THE B & F SYSTEM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-192 (HL)
v.
LLOYD J. LEBLANC JR., MAXAM
WHOLESALE OF ATLANTA, INC., DIRECT
SOURCE IMPORTS, INC., ARTHUR
JEFFREY LEBLANC, LLOYD LEBLANC III,
PRODUCTOS MEXICANOS DON JOSE,
INC., LEBLANC’S LLC, and EDNA G.
LEBLANC,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been
tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. The Court has also ruled on the parties’
post-trial motions. The Court renders the following Final Judgment pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
1.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendant Lloyd J.
LeBlanc Jr. the sum of $72,114 for breach of the Maxam Independent Distributor
Agreement, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C.
§ 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
2.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendant Lloyd J.
LeBlanc Jr. the sum of $35,665 for breach of the Service Mark License Agreement,
with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)
from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
3.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Arthur
Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd LeBlanc III, Direct Source Imports, Inc., and Productos
Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $7,500 for Direct Source
Imports, Inc.’s tortious interference with the Maxam Independent Distributor
Agreement, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C.
§ 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
4.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Arthur
Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd LeBlanc III, Lloyd J. LeBlanc Jr., and Edna G. LeBlanc, jointly
and severally, the sum of $35,665 for Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc’s tortious interference
with the Service Mark License Agreement, with post-judgment interest thereon at the
rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until
paid in full.
5.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Lloyd
LeBlanc III, Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd J. LeBlanc Jr., and Edna G. LeBlanc,
jointly and severally, the sum of $35,665 for Lloyd LeBlanc III’s tortious interference
with the Service Mark License Agreement, with post-judgment interest thereon at the
rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until
paid in full.
6.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants
Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., Direct Source Imports, Inc., Arthur Jeffrey
LeBlanc, and Lloyd LeBlanc III, jointly and severally, the sum of $35,665 for
2
Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc.’s tortious interference with the Service Mark
License Agreement, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by
28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
7.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Direct
Source Imports, Inc., Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc,
and Lloyd LeBlanc III, jointly and severally, the sum of $57,066 for Direct Source
Imports, Inc.’s tortious interference with the Service Mark License Agreement, with
post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) from
the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
8.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Lloyd J.
LeBlanc Jr., Edna G. LeBlanc, Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd LeBlanc III, Maxam
Wholesale of Atlanta, Inc., Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., and Direct Source
Imports, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $600,000 as damages on Plaintiff’s
Lanham Act claims, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28
U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
9.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Lloyd J.
LeBlanc Jr., Edna G. LeBlanc, Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd LeBlanc III, Maxam
Wholesale of Atlanta, Inc., Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., and Direct Source
Imports, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $357,040 as profits on Plaintiff’s
Lanham Act claims, with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate as provided by 28
U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment is entered until paid in full.
3
10.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendant Arthur
Jeffrey LeBlanc the sum of $180,000 in statutory damages on Plaintiff’s
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act claim, with post-judgment interest
thereon at the rate as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) from the date this Judgment
is entered until paid in full.
11.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover from Defendants Lloyd J.
LeBlanc Jr., Edna G. LeBlanc, Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd LeBlanc III, Maxam
Wholesale of Atlanta, Inc., Productos Mexicanos Don Jose, Inc., and Direct Source
Imports, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $372,857.50 in attorney’s fees and
$2,354.11 in non-taxable costs.
12.
Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. on all
counterclaims brought by Defendant Lloyd J. LeBlanc Jr.
13.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant LeBlanc’s LLC on all claims
brought by Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc.
14.
Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants on Plaintiff The B & F
System, Inc.’s claim for punitive damages.
15.
The counterclaim brought by Defendants Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc, Lloyd
LeBlanc III, and Direct Source Imports, Inc. against Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc.
is dismissed.
16.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc. shall recover its costs of this action.
4
17.
Defendants Lloyd LeBlanc Jr., Edna G. LeBlanc, Arthur Jeffrey LeBlanc,
Lloyd LeBlanc III, Maxam Wholesale of Atlanta, Inc., Productos Mexicanos Don
Jose, Inc., and Direct Source Imports, Inc., their respective officers, agents,
employees, successors and assigns, and any other person or entity in active concert
or participation with them are ordered to immediately destroy any and all print and
electronic copies of Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc.’s master customer list still within
their possession, including but not limited to Plaintiff’s Exhibits 136, 137, and 197,
and are ordered to destroy all advertising and promotional materials or other printed
material containing the marks “MAXAM” or “MAXAM WHOLESALE.” They are also
permanently enjoined from the following: (1) making use of the contents of Plaintiff’s
master customer list for any and all purposes; (2) transferring or conveying Plaintiff’s
master customer list to any person or entity; (3) all use of any name, designation, or
mark containing the phrases “MAXAM” or “MAXAM WHOLESALE,” or any marks
similar thereto or likely to cause confusion therewith, in the manufacturing,
production, marketing, promotion, display, sale, offering for sale, distribution or
advertising of any products or services; (4) making any statements or
representations, or using the “MAXAM” or “MAXAM WHOLESALE” marks in any way
that suggests an affiliation, connection, sponsorship, or association with Plaintiff; (5)
all advertising, promotion, and sale of any product containing any steam control lid
knob substantially similar to Plaintiff’s lid knob depicted in its Supplemental Register
lid knob trademark (the “infringing lid knob”), including but not limited to removing all
5
photographs of such items from www.buydsi.com, www.heirloomcookware.com, and
www.kitchenpridecookware.com; (6) marketing, promoting, advertising, selling,
offering for sale, distributing, or otherwise disposing of any product containing the
infringing lid knob; (7) destroying, altering, disposing of, concealing, or tampering
with all business records, emails, invoices, purchase orders, confirmation orders,
packing lists, records, and other information associated with the purchase, receipt,
sale, production, promotion, or other disposition of products containing the infringing
lid knob; (8) otherwise violating Plaintiff’s trademark rights; (9) effecting assignments
or transfers, forming new entities or associations, or utilizing any other device for the
purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth above; and
(10) aiding, abetting, contributing to, or otherwise assisting from engaging in
activities enjoined above.
18.
Plaintiff The B & F System, Inc.’s Bill of Costs will be considered by the
Clerk of Court post-judgment.
19.
All relief not expressly granted herein is hereby denied.
SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2012.
s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?