Mann et al v. Donald et al

Filing 43

ORDER granting 27 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/25/2009. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civil Action No. 7:08-cv-5 (HL) : COMMISSIONER JAMES DONALD, : et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________ ASTANIEL JARVIS MANN, et al., ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 34) of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge, entered February 27, 2009, as modified by Order entered March 9, 2009. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiffs' motion to join Plaintiffs and add Defendants (Doc. 27) be granted. Neither party has filed objections to the Recommendation.1 In the absence of a timely objection, a district court need only consider the Recommendation for clear error. See, e.g., Macort v. Prem, Inc., No. 06-12316, 2006 WL 3473734, *2 (11th Cir. Nov. 30, 2006). After review of the record, the Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Recommendation is accepted and Plaintiffs' motion is granted as more fully set forth in the The Recommendations were due on March 18, 2009. Because the Order entered March 9, 2009, did not alter the merits of the Recommendation, but corrected an error regarding the issue of service in the event the Recommendation is accepted by the Court, it did not affect the date on which objections to the Recommendation were due. 1 Recommendation, and as modified by Order entered March 9, 2009. SO ORDERED, this the 25th day of March, 2009. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE mls 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?