Sumner et al v. Biomet, Inc.

Filing 91

ORDER directing Plaintiff to file response to 51 Motion for Summary Judgment not later than 6/23/2010; directing Defendant to comply with rules regarding the filing of a reply. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/8/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ELIZABETH L. SUMNER and RAY G. SUMNER, Plaintiffs, v. BIOMET, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : ORDER In a previous Order (Doc. 64), this Court granted an extension to the Plaintiffs to file their response to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 51) until after the Plaintiffs had the opportunity to inspect certain devices and to depose the Defendant's 30(b)(6) witness. In two other Orders (Docs. 82 & 85), this Court established the deadlines for inspections and 30(b)(6) depositions. Those deadlines having passed, the Plaintiffs are instructed to file their response to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment not later than June 23, 2010. Thereafter, the Defendant shall comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia regarding the filing of its reply. SO ORDERED, this the 8th day of June, 2010. Case No. 7:08-CV-98 (HL) s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE jch

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?