Woods v. Warnock et al

Filing 22

ORDER finding as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/30/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
Woods v. Warnock et al Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA V A L D O S T A DIVISION T R A V IS A. WOODS, P la in tiff, C iv il Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL) v. O F F IC E R WARNOCK, JOSH ADCOCK, C A P T A IN MICHAEL KEENE, and MARK E L K IN S , Defendants. ORDER T h e Recommendation (Doc. 20) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q . Langstaff, entered November 3, 2010, is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge re c o m m e n d s that this case be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for lack o f prosecution by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed a written objection to the R e c o m m e n d a tio n , as permitted by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed th e Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. A c c o rd in g ly , the Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation (Doc. 20), and this c a s e is dismisssed. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) filed by Defendants is denied a s moot. S O ORDERED, this the 30 th day of November, 2010. s / Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE m bh Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?