Woods v. Warnock et al

Filing 22

ORDER finding as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/30/2010. (nbp)

Woods v. Warnock et al

Doc. 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA V A L D O S T A DIVISION T R A V IS A. WOODS, P la in tiff, C iv il Action 7:09-CV-105 (HL) v. O F F IC E R WARNOCK, JOSH ADCOCK, C A P T A IN MICHAEL KEENE, and MARK E L K IN S , Defendants. ORDER T h e Recommendation (Doc. 20) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q . Langstaff, entered November 3, 2010, is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge re c o m m e n d s that this case be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for lack o f prosecution by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed a written objection to the R e c o m m e n d a tio n , as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed th e Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. A c c o rd in g ly , the Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation (Doc. 20), and this c a s e is dismisssed. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) filed by Defendants is denied a s moot. S O ORDERED, this the 30 th day of November, 2010.

s / Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE m bh

Dockets.Justia.com