Tate v. Blanton et al

Filing 65

ORDER denying 62 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/29/2011. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION DAVID TATE, : : Plaintiff : : VS. : : FRANK BLANTON, : : Defendants : _____________________________________ CIVIL ACTION NO: 7:09-CV-142-HL ORDER Plaintiff DAVID TATE has filed a Notice of Appeal [Doc. 62], which as also been construed as a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. The basis for Plaintiff’s appeal is unclear, and in the Court’s best judgment, an appeal cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Thus, having been carefully considered, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal is DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $ 455.00 appellate filing fee. Because Plaintiff cannot pay the $ 455.00 immediately, he must pay using the partial payment plan described under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Pursuant to §1915(b), the prison account custodian where Plaintiff is incarcerated shall cause to be remitted to the Clerk of this Court monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s account until the $ 455.00 appellate filing fee has been paid in full. Twenty percent of any deposits into the prisoner’s account shall be withheld by the prison account custodian who, on a monthly basis, shall forward the amount withheld from the prisoner’s account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the total filing fee of $455.00 has been paid. Checks should be made payable to “Clerk, U.S. District Court.” The Clerk of Court is accordingly DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the custodian of the prison in which Plaintiff is incarcerated. SO ORDERED AND DIRECTED this 29th day of November, 2011. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT jlr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?