O'Brien v. Perkins et al

Filing 70

ORDER granting 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 62 Report and Recommendations; finding as moot 66 Motion to Impute Disqualification. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 5/29/2012. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION

LARRY THOMAS O’BRIEN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL)

DANIEL HANCOCK,
Defendant.

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 62), entered on April 17, 2012, in which
he recommends that Defendants= Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) be granted.
Plaintiff has filed what the Court broadly construes as an objection to the
Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of the Recommendation, and
after careful consideration, accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations of
the Magistrate Judge. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is granted.
Plaintiff’s objection is overruled.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Impute Disqualification (Doc. 66) is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED, this the 29th day of May, 2012.

s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh