Seymour v. Philbin et al

Filing 35

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 12/07/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
Seymour v. Philbin et al Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA V A L D O S T A DIVISION C H A R L E S SEYMOUR, P la in tiff, C iv il Action 7:10-CV-38 (HL) v. D e p u ty Warden TED PHILBIN, et. al., Defendants. ORDER T h is case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States M a g is tra te Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 18), entered on November 2, 2010. T h e Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants Nickle be dismissed from this a c tio n and that Plaintiff's challenge to his conviction be dismissed. P la in tiff has filed an objection (Doc. 32) to the recommendation to dismiss D e fe n d a n t Nickle. The Court has made a de novo review of the portions of the R e c o m m e n d a tio n to which objection has been made. After careful consideration, the C o u r t accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the M a g is tra te Judge. Defendants Nickle is dismissed from this action. As Plaintiff has not made an objection to the recommendation to dismiss the c h a lle n g e to his conviction, the Court reviews that recommendation for clear error o n ly . The Court finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, and a c c e p ts and adopts the recommendation. Plaintiff's challenge to his conviction is d is m is s e d . SO ORDERED, this the 7 th day of December, 2010. s / Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE m bh 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?