Gould v. Owens et al
Filing
96
ORDER denying 26 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting 69 Motion to Dismiss; granting 85 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 95 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/3/2011. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
ARTHUR GOULD,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 7:10-CV-95 (HL)
v.
BRIAN OWENS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
The Recommendation (Doc. 95) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q.
Langstaff, entered July 6, 2011, is before the Court. No objections to the Recommendation
were filed. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the
Magistrate
Judge’s decision. Therefore,
the Court accepts and adopts the
Recommendation.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 26) is denied. Defendants Owens,
Danforth, Philbin, Moore, Waters, and Skinner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38) is granted.
Defendants Shoe and Cooper-Wolfe’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46) is granted. Defendants
Owens and Waters’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 69) is granted.
Defendants Alexander, Richards, Myrick, and Fields’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (Doc. 85) is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile the case but must pay the filing fee at the outset of the lawsuit.
SO ORDERED, this the 3rd day of August, 2011.
mbh
s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?