Pace v. Hurst Boilers & Welding Co.

Filing 17

ORDER converting 5 Motion to Dismiss Complaint to a Motion for Summary Judgment. Additional documents may be filed not later than 12/30/2010. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 12/14/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
Pace v. Hurst Boilers & Welding Co. Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT M ID D L E DISTRICT OF GEORGIA V A L D O S T A DIVISION W IL L IE PACE, Plaintiff, C iv il Action No. 7:10-CV-116 v. H U R S T BOILER & WELDING CO., Defendant. ORDER T h is action is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5). R u le 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: "If, on a motion under R u le 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not e x c lu d e d by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment u n d e r Rule 56. All parties must be given a reasonable opportunity to present all the m a te ria l that is pertinent to the motion." U p o n review of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, the Court has discovered that D e fe n d a n t is relying on matters outside the pleadings, specifically an affidavit from D a rle n e Hobbs, to support its Motion.1 Thus, the Court finds it is appropriate to c o n v e rt Defendant's Motion to a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule o f Civil Procedure 56. The parties shall file any additional documents that they deem p e rtin e n t to the issues raised in Defendants' Motion by December 30, 2010. 1 W h ile Defendant is also relying on documents from Plaintiff's bankruptcy case, th e Court can take judicial notice of those documents. Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff is advised that the granting of this motion would represent a final a d ju d ic a tio n of this action which may foreclose subsequent litigation on this matter. S e e Somerville v. Hall, 2 F.3d 1563, 1564 (11th Cir. 1993); Griffith v. Wainwright, 7 7 2 F.2d 822 (11th Cir. 1985). It is important to note that, except in certain c irc u m s ta n c e s , a person against whom a motion for summary judgment is filed may n o t rely on the allegations of his pleadings. In other words, a plaintiff against whom a motion for summary judgment is filed must oppose that motion by affidavits, d e p o s itio n s , answers to interrogatories, admissions, or as otherwise provided in the ru le s . If a party against whom a motion for summary judgment is filed fails to re s p o n d , the materials filed by the moving party may be taken as true. SO ORDERED, this 14th day of December, 2010. s / Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE m bh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?