Anderson et al v. Blake et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 30 Motion Requesting Clarification. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/24/2011. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
BARBARA ANDERSON and
SCOTT ANDERSON,
Civil Action 7:11-CV-42 (HL)

Plaintiffs,
v.
MICHELLE ROSE BLAKE and
BRANDON M. BENNETT,
Defendants.
ORDER

The parties have filed a Consent Motion requesting clarification from the
Court as to whether Plaintiffs’ treating physicians would be required to provide
Rule 26 expert reports. The parties have agreed between themselves that no
expert reports will be required for Plaintiffs’ treating physicians. Per that
agreement, the Motion (Doc. 30) is granted with the following caveat from the
Court: all parties will be prohibited from filing any objections to or motions to
exclude the treating physicians’ testimony based on the lack of a Rule 26 report.
SO ORDERED, this the 24th day of August, 2011.
s/Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE

mbh