McFall v. Scruggs et al
Filing
24
ORDER memorializing conference call of 3/8/12. Deadline for discovery extended to 3/27/12; deadline for dispositive motions extended to 5/11/2012. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/12/3012. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
CATHERINE McFALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-53 (HL)
FERROL SCRUGGS d/b/a THE
SCRUGGS COMPANY and STEVE
MURRAY,
Defendants.
ORDER
Pursuant to the telephone conference call held on March 8, 2012, the
Court orders the parties to comply with the following directives:
1. Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to submit discovery responses to Defendant
no later than Tuesday, March 13, 2012.
2. Plaintiff’s counsel must ensure that Plaintiff Catherine McFall is made
available to Defendant for deposition before Friday, March 23, 2012.
3. Defendant’s counsel must ensure that Steve Murray and Ferrol Scruggs
are available for deposition before Friday, March 23, 2012.
4. Defendant should submit to the Court an itemized list of expenses that
have been incurred in this case as a result of Plaintiff’s failure to timely
respond to discovery.
Additionally, all deadlines in this case have been extended by fifteen days.
Therefore, discovery will expire on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. All motions to join
other parties, to dismiss a party, or to otherwise amend the pleadings shall be
filed on or before Thursday, April 26, 2012. All dispositive motions are due no
later than Friday, May 11, 2012.
As expressed by the Court during the conference call, there will be no
further extensions in this case. If any problems arise with completing discovery or
submitting motions within the above-listed deadlines, the parties should inform
the Court at once so that the Court can attempt to resolve any problems.
SO ORDERED, this 12th day of March, 2012.
s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
ebr
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?