Wright v. Shoe et al

Filing 52

ORDER granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting 48 Report and Recommendations; denying 50 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 51 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 5/24/2012. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
LARRY D. WRIGHT JR.,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-74 (HL)
v.
LESA SHOE and EUGENE CREWS, M.D.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 48), entered on May 1, 2012. Judge
Langstaff recommends that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Shoe and Crews
(Doc. 28) be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The
Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The
Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 28) is granted.
Plaintiff’s Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. 50) and Motion to Appoint Counsel
(Doc. 51) are denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 24th day of May, 2012.

s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh