JENKINS v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/25/2013. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION JULIA A. JENKINS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-92 (HL) v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Defendant. ORDER The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff is before the Court. (Doc. 13). Judge Langstaff recommends that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g). Plaintiff has filed objections to the Recommendation. She specifically contends (1) that the ALJ erred in finding her allegations of disability not entirely credible; and (2) that the ALJ improperly discounted the opinions of her treating neurosurgeon, Dr. Edward Mark. Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. The Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation. The Commissioner’s decision is affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g). SO ORDERED, this the 25th day of February, 2013. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE mbh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?