DAUGHARTY et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Filing 4

ORDER granting 3 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/16/2012. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION JANICE DAUGHARTY and SEWARD DAUGHARTY, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-49 (HL) v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR PARK AVENUE BANK, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) Motion to Stay (Doc. 3). The FDIC has been appointed as a receiver in this case for the original defendant, Park Avenue Bank. The Court finds that there is good reason for a stay in this case and the Motion is granted. The Eleventh Circuit has recognized that while the appointment of a receiver does not divest a court of jurisdiction over a claim, jurisdiction in such a case is dependent upon the completion of the administrative process with respect to the claim. F.D.I.C. v. LaCentra Trucking, Inc., 157 F.3d 1292, 1308 (11th Cir. 1998). According to 12 U.S.C. §1821(12)(A), After the appointment of a conservator or receiver for an insured depository institution, the conservator or receiver may request a stay for a period not to exceed – (i) 45 days, in the case of any conservator; and (ii) 90 days, in the case of any receiver, in any judicial action or proceeding to which such institution is or becomes a party. Further, “upon receipt of a request by any conservator or receiver … for a stay of any judicial action or proceeding in any court …, the court shall grant such stay as to all parties.” 12 U.S.C. § 1821(12)(B). Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1821(A)-(B), the Court grants Defendant’s request for a 90-day stay to allow time for the completion of administrative procedures. The stay will be lifted on Monday, July 16, 2012 and the parties are ordered to file a status update no later than Monday, July 23, 2012. SO ORDERED, this 16th day of April, 2012. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE ebr  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?