OWENS et al v. STIFEL NICOLAUS & COMPANY INC
Filing
47
ORDER memorializing phone conference and Court's rulings of 11/18/2013. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/18/2013. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
MARTHA F. OWENS, Individually,
and as the Executrix of the Estate of
Andrew T. Fuller; SUSAN ROCKETT;
DONALD ABNER POPE JR.; and
REFUSE MATERIALS, INC.,
Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-144 (HL)
Plaintiffs,
v.
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY,
INC. and ANTHONY JOHN FISHER,
Defendants.
ORDER
The Court held a telephone conference on November 18, 2013 to discuss
several outstanding discovery matters. This Order memorializes the rulings made
during the conference.
1.
Stifel, Nicolaus is ordered to produce to Plaintiffs’ counsel the names
of all former and current Stifel, Nicolaus clients who had any dealings with
Anthony Fisher relating to Cardiac Network, Inc. The names must be produced
by the close of business on November 18, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiffs may not
contact these clients by any means until November 26, 2013.
2.
Stifel, Nicolaus is ordered to produce to the Court all documents
listed in its privilege log no later than December 2, 2013 for an in camera
inspection. The documents and privilege log must be produced in a legible form,
and the sender and receipient(s) must be identified (i.e., Jim Smith is in-house
counsel; Jane Johnson is the branch manager). In addition, a detailed
explanation as to why each document is privileged must be provided.
3.
Both parties are ordered to reclassify all documents produced during
discovery and identify which documents are responsive to what request(s) for
production. This information must be exchanged no later than December 2, 2013.
SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of November, 2013.
s/ Hugh Lawson_______________
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?