DENSON v. Miller et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/21/2013. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION

RANDY DENSON,

:
:
Plaintiff
:
:
vs.
:
:
District Attorney DAVID MILLER and :
Assistant District Attorney BRADFIELD :
M. SHEALY,
:
:
Defendants
:
____________________________________

CIVIL NO. 7:13-CV-0102-HL-TQL

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff Randy Denson, an inmate currently confined at Rutledge State Prison in
Columbus, Georgia, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After
conducting a preliminary review of Plaintiff’s Complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. §1915A(a), the
Court found that the Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and sought
monetary relief from immune defendants. The Complaint was accordingly dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b).
Plaintiff has now filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 7). In this Motion, Plaintiff
alleges that the Court erred in dismissing his claim against Bradford Shealy and suggests that an
attorney is not protected by prosecutorial immunity if he has violated a rule of professional
conduct.

Plaintiff’s argument has no merit, and his Motion provides no valid basis for

reconsideration. The present motion is accordingly DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this 21st day of August, 2013.

s/ Hugh Lawson
_
HUGH LAWSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
jlr

2