SPRAYBERRY v. ALLEN et al

Filing 89

ORDER denying 67 Motion for Protective Order; adopting 77 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 11/10/2014. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION

HUBERT T. SPRAYBERRY
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 7:13-CV-136 (HL)

JOSEPH SCHNAKE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 77). Judge Langstaff recommends
denying Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order. (Doc. 67).
Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation (Doc. 81). Upon
conducting a de novo review of the Recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections,
the Court overrules Plaintiff’s objections and accepts and adopts the
Recommendation.
SO ORDERED, this 10th day of November, 2014.

s/ Hugh Lawson______________
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE

aks