GREEN v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS INC et al
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Stay Discovery. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/25/2013. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
JOHN GREEN,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
v.
7:13-cv-00137-HL
BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS,
INC., NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
LLC,
Defendant.
[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Stay Discovery filed by
Defendants Bank of America, N.A., erroneously named as Bank of America Home
Loans,
Inc.
(“BANA”)1
and
Nationstar
Mortgage,
LLC
(“Nationstar”)
(“Defendants”).
Upon consideration of the Motion and the arguments contained in the
accompanying Memorandum of Law, the Court finds that there is sufficient
1
Plaintiff names “Bank of America Home Loans, Inc.” as a defendant; however, no legal entity
exists by that name. Defendants assume that Plaintiff meant to name Bank of America Home
Loans, which was a trade name for BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. On July 1, 2011, BAC
Home Loans Servicing, L.P. merged with and into Bank of America, N.A. Thus, Bank of
America, N.A. responds on behalf of the erroneously named entity “Bank of America Home
Loans, Inc.”
1
evidence and just cause for the Court to stay discovery while the Court considers
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED,
staying the discovery period and the parties’ requirements to comply with their
respective obligations.
It is furthermore ORDERED that should the Court later deny Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, the parties shall comply with all mandates
of the federal and local rules within thirty (30) days of the Court’s Order denying
said motion.
25th
November
SO ORDERED this _____ day of _________, 2013.
s/Hugh Lawson
U.S. District Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?