HEAVNER v. SOUTHWEST GEORGIA OIL COMPANY, INC

Filing 50

ORDER finding as moot 46 Motion for Settlement; granting 49 Amended Motion; dismissing case with prejudice. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 9/25/2014. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ANTHONY HEAVNER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 7:13-CV-145 (HL) SOUTHWEST GEORGIA OIL COMPANY, INC. d/b/a PIGGLY WIGGLY, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Amended Motion for Court Review and Approval of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Case with Prejudice (Doc. 49). The parties ask the Court to approve the settlement of Plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216. The Court is required to undertake a fairness review of the proposed settlement. See § 216(b); Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). The Court held a hearing on the proposed settlement on September 17, 2014. Now, having reviewed the settlement agreement and having discussed it at the hearing with the parties, the Court approves it as a fair settlement of the reasonable dispute concerning Plaintiff’s FLSA claims. The motion is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will briefly touch on three other motions. Because the amended motion to approve the settlement has been granted, the earlier Joint Motion for Court Review and Approval of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement (Doc. 46) is denied as moot. The Court also confirms that Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion (Doc. 39) and Amended Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 41), which were also discussed at the hearing on September 17, have been granted. SO ORDERED, this the 25th day of September, 2014. s/ Hugh Lawson_______________ HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE scr 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?