MINES v. BARBER et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying 10 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 7/2/2014. (nbp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION

GREGORY ALLEN MINES,
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 7:13-CV-163 (HL)

ANTHONY BARBER, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 10) by Plaintiff
Gregory Mines (“Plaintiff”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Plaintiff is
a prisoner currently confined at a state prison. He asks the Court to reconsider its
Order (Doc. 9) dismissing his Complaint, stating 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, after
its preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The motion is denied.

Plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with newly-discovered evidence or to point
it to manifest errors of law or fact that would support his motion. See Sherrod v.
Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Dist., 237 F. App’x 423, 424 (11th Cir. 2007); In re
Kellog, 197 F.3d 1116, 1119 (11th Cir. 1999).
SO ORDERED, this the 2nd day of July, 2014.

s/ Hugh Lawson_______________
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
scr