Filing 8

ORDER for Response to Motion re: 6 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by CHAD WYNN, MICHAEL MOSES. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 4/14/2014. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION WILLIAM STEWART, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:14-CV-34 (HL) v. MICHAEL STEWART and, CHAD WYNN, Defendants. ORDER Defendants Michael Stewart and Chad Wynn filed a joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on April 11, 2014, requesting that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed. The Court directs Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to the dictates of the following notice: The Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Accordingly, the Court deems it appropriate and necessary to advise him of his right to respond to said Motion and of the consequences he may suffer if he fails to file a response thereto. The Court advises Plaintiff that: (1) a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings has been filed by Defendants; (2) Plaintiff has the right to oppose the granting of said Motion; and (3) if Plaintiff fails to oppose said Motion, his Complaint may be dismissed. The Court further advises Plaintiff that under the procedures and policies of this Court, motions to dismiss typically are decided on briefs. The Court considers the pleadings and briefs filed by the parties in deciding whether dismissal is appropriate under the law. Failure of the Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, therefore, may result in the granting of the Motion. There would be no trial or further proceedings. Accordingly, the Plaintiff is ordered and directed to file a response to said Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings BY NO LATER THAN MAY 5, 2014. Thereafter, the Court will consider the Motion and any opposition filed by Plaintiff. SO ORDERED, this 14th day of April, 2014. s/ Hugh Lawson_______________ HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE aks

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?