WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 5

ORDER dismissing as moot Petitioner's petition without prejudice. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 8/25/2014. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION KENNETH WILLIAMS, Petitioner VS. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _________________________________ : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL No. 7:14-CV-98-HL-TQL PROCEEDINGS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ORDER Petitioner Kenneth Williams filed what the court deemed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1.) Petitioner was thereafter ordered to pay the filing fee or file a proper motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4.) Petitioner was also ordered to re-file his habeas petition on this Court’s standard § 2241 forms. Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court’s order in the time allowed. On July 9, 2014, Petitioner was released from custody at Valdosta State Prison. (Doc. 3.) “[A] case is moot when the issues presented are no longer live or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Al Najjar v. Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 1330, 1335-36 (11th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “If events that occur subsequent to the filing of a lawsuit or an appeal deprive the court of the ability to give the plaintiff or appellant meaningful relief, then the case is moot and must be dismissed.” Id. at 1336. Where a habeas petitioner who was protesting his detention is no longer in custody, the dispute with regard to his 1 detention is mooted. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1998) (discussing “in custody” requirement of habeas statute 28 U.S.C. § 2254). Since the Court can no longer give the Petitioner any meaningful relief, the case is moot and “dismissal is required because mootness is jurisdictional.” Al Najjar, 273 F.3d at 1336. WHEREFORE, Petitioner’s petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is hereby DISMISSED as MOOT without prejudice to his right to file a new petition in the future if a change in his circumstances occurs. SO ORDERED, this 25th day of August, 2014. s/ Hugh Lawson________________ HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE lws 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?