Cobb v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 42

MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Motion for Protective Order and accompanying attachments by Google, Inc.. (ank)

Download PDF
Cobb v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 42 ORIGINAL FILED I N CLERK'S OFFICE .S . b , U C . Atlanta UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION J A 8 , IlAfi'TN, Clark oar o 72008 JONATHAN COBB, Plaintiff, v GOGGLE INC . and WORKFORCE LOGIC LLC, Defendants . MO TIO N TO FI LE DO CUMENTS UNDER SEAL COMES NOW Defendant Google Inc . ("Google"), and pursuant to Standing Order No . 04-01 (In re : Electronic Case Filing and Administrative Procedures), Case No. 1 :08-CV-0483 (MHS) entered June 1, 2004, and the Protective Order Limiting the Use And Dissemination of Confidential Mater i al, entered June 23, 2008 [Doc; . No.. 32], hereby moves to file its Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Protective Order and accompanying attachments under seal . Google's filing contains information that has been designated as "Highly Confidential" under the Protective Order, and therefore, filing under seal is necessary to abide by the Court's Order . Dockets.Justia.com A proposed Order is provided with this filing . Served this 7th day of October, 2008. Enc . Schroeder (Georgia Bar No . 629880) R . Joseph Burby, IV (Georgia Bar No . 094503) John C. Bush (Georgia Bar No . 413159) POWELL GOLDSTEIN LLP One Atlantic Center Fourteenth F l oor Atlanta, Georgia 30309 (404) 572-6600 (404) 572-6999 eschroeder@pogolaw .com Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JONATHAN COBB, Plaintiff, V. Case No . 1 :08-CV-0483 (MHS) GOOGLE INC . and WORKFORCELOGIC USA, Defendants . rProposed] O RDE R REGARDING DO CUMENTS UNDER SEAL THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Defendant Google Inc .'s Motion to File Documents Under Seal, and the Court having reviewed the said motion, it is thereupon, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows : Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Protective Order and accompanying attachments shall be filed and remain under seal until further Order by this Court . SO ORDERED, this day of , 2008. Marvin H. Shoob Judge, U.S . District Court Northern District of Georgia FI LED IN CLE RK'S OFFICE U .S .D.C. Atlanta UN I TE D STATES DI ST RI CT COURT N ORTHE RN DI STRICT O F GE ORGIA ATLANTA DI VI SIO N JONATHAN COBB, EN, J 37 HAe ut Clerk 1 N: p y Clark Plaintiff, V. Case No . 1 :OS-CV-0483 (MHS) GOOGLE INC . and WORKFORCELOGIC USA, Defendants . L R 7 . 1(D)-CERTIFICATE OF F ONT COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that the foregoing has been prepared with one of the font and point selections approved by the Court in Rule 5 .1 (C) of the Civil Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, specifically Times New Roman 14 pt . 5235077_I .DOC 'r~c~ P .'2~ Ei Schroeder FILED IN CLEWS OFFICE . O CR 072008 UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT N ORTHE RN DI STRICT O F GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JONATHAN COBB, Plaintiff, V. GOOGLE INC . and WORKFORCE LOGIC LLC, Defendants . CERTI FI CATE O F SERVICE I hereby certify that on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, a copy of Defendant Google Inc .'s Motion to File Under Seal was sent via U.S . Mail to the following attorneys of record : Michael Alan bailey ANDERSON DAILEY LLP 2002 Summit Boulevard Suite 1250 Atlanta, Georgia 30319 404-442-1800 404-442-1820 (facsimile) mdailey@andersondailey .com J N fi~~"fT E i~, clerk ,~ '~" r-edb puty 0110 Case No. 1 :08-CV-0483 (MHS) Gary Hill HILL A ND BL EI BERG 47 Perimeter Center Atlanta, Georgia 30346 770-394-7800 ghill@hillandbleiberg .com Joan Dillon JOAN DILLON LAW LLC 3522 Ashford Dunwoody Road PMB 235 Atlanta, Georgia 30319 404-257-17 0 8 joan@joandillonlaw .com Charlotte K . McClusky John C . Fish LITTLER MENDELSON, P .C . 3348 Peachtree Road, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1008 404-233-0330 404-233-2361 (facsimile) Eric P . Schroeder Suite 1100

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?