Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 294

ORDER that the Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the Plaintiffs' 291 MOTION to Amend Trial Exhibit List attached to the 278 Proposed Pretrial Order by Thursday, 5/12/2011 at 5:00 PM if they wish to respond. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/10/2011. (ank)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION FILED IN CHAMBERS . U.S.D.c. . Atlanta CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS; OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Plaint MAY 1 02011 fs, • Clerk v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. ! ',08 Deputy Cieri< CV-"',-OD8 MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as President of Georgia State University; RISA PALM, in her official capacity as Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost of Georgia State University; J.L. ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State un~vers~ty Assoc~ate Provost for Information Systems and Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in her offic~al capacity as Dean of.Libraries at Georgia State un~vers~ty; ROBERT F. HATCHER, in his Official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia; KENNETH R. BERNARD, JR., JAMES A BISHOP, FREDERICK E. COOPER, LARRY R. ELLIS, FELTON JENKINS, W. MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., JAMES R. JOLLY, DONALD M. LEEBERN, JR., WILLIAM NESMITH, JR., DOREEN STILES POITEVINT, WILLIS J. POTTS, JR., WANDA YANCEY RODWELL, KESSEL STELLING, JR., BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III, RICHARD L. TUCKER, ALLAN VIGIL, and LARRY WALKER, in their official capacities as members of the Boara of Regents of the University System of Georgia Defendants. ORDER This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend their Trial Exhibit List [Doc. 291]. The Court ORDERS Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion by Thursday, May 12, 2011 at 5:00 p.m, if they wish to respond. SO ORDERED, this 10 day of May, 2011. _(ft~,ORINDA D.~E~V~AN;;S~~~-------------UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?