Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
294
ORDER that the Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the Plaintiffs' 291 MOTION to Amend Trial Exhibit List attached to the 278 Proposed Pretrial Order by Thursday, 5/12/2011 at 5:00 PM if they wish to respond. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/10/2011. (ank)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
FILED IN CHAMBERS .
U.S.D.c. . Atlanta
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS;
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.;
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Plaint
MAY 1 02011
fs,
• Clerk
v.
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
! ',08
Deputy Cieri<
CV-"',-OD8
MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as President of
Georgia State University; RISA
PALM, in her official capacity
as Senior Vice President for
Academic Affairs and Provost of
Georgia State University; J.L.
ALBERT, in his official
capacity as Georgia State
un~vers~ty Assoc~ate Provost
for Information Systems and
Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in
her offic~al capacity as Dean
of.Libraries at Georgia State
un~vers~ty; ROBERT F. HATCHER,
in his Official capacity as
Vice Chair of the Board of
Regents of the University
System of Georgia; KENNETH R.
BERNARD, JR., JAMES A BISHOP,
FREDERICK E. COOPER, LARRY R.
ELLIS, FELTON JENKINS, W.
MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., JAMES
R. JOLLY, DONALD M. LEEBERN,
JR., WILLIAM NESMITH, JR.,
DOREEN STILES POITEVINT, WILLIS
J. POTTS, JR., WANDA YANCEY
RODWELL, KESSEL STELLING, JR.,
BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III,
RICHARD L. TUCKER, ALLAN VIGIL,
and LARRY WALKER, in their
official capacities as members
of the Boara of Regents of the
University System of Georgia
Defendants.
ORDER
This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to
Amend
their
Trial
Exhibit
List
[Doc.
291].
The
Court
ORDERS
Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion by Thursday, May 12, 2011
at 5:00 p.m, if they wish to respond.
SO ORDERED, this
10
day of May, 2011.
_(ft~,ORINDA D.~E~V~AN;;S~~~-------------UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?