Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 311

ORDER that the Plaintiffs' 291 Motion to Amend their Trial Exhibit List is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs may amend their trial exhibit list to include the document numbered OUP900003-0UP900005 only, as no party objects to this amendment. Plaintiffs may not amend their trial exhibit list to add any of the other documents Plaintiffs seek to add. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/13/2011. (ank)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS;
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.;
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.

FILED IN CHAMBERS
V.S.D.C. . Atlanta

MAY 13 2011
~

!

Plaintiffs,

DeputyCI rk

v.

!CIVIL ACTION NO.

11:08-CV-142S-0DE

~ARK

P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as President of
Georgia State University; RISA
PALM, in her official capacity
as Senior Vice President for
Academic Affairs and Provost of
Georgia State University; J.L.

ALBERT, in his official

capacity as Georgia State

Unlverslty Assoclate Provost
for Information Systems and
Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in
her officlal capacity as Dean
of Libraries at Georgia State
University; ROBERT F. HATCHER,
in his official capacity as
Vice Chair of the Board of
Regents of the University

System of Georgia; KENNETH R.

BERNARD, JR., JAMES A BISHOP,

FREDERICK E. COOPER, LARRY R.

ELLIS, FELTON JENKINS, W.

Mfu'VSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., JAMES

R. JOLLY, DONALD M. LEEBERN ,
JR., WILLIAM NESMITH, JR.,
DOREEN STILES POITEVINT, WILLIS
J. POTTS, JR., WANDA YANCEY

RODWELL, KESSEL STELLING, JR.,

BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III,
RICHARD L. TUCKER, ALLAN VIGIL,
and LARRY WALKER, in their

official capacities as members

of the Board of Regents of the

University System of Georgia
Defendants.
ORDER
This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to
Amend

their

Trial

Exhibit

List

responded in opposition [Doc. 309J.

[Doc.

291J

to

which

Defendants

Having considered the parties'

arguments, the Court GRANTS the Motion in part and DENIES the Motion
in part.

Plaintiffs may amended their trial exhibit list to include

the document numbered OUP900003-0UP900005 only, as no party objects
to this amendment.

Plaintiffs may not amend their trial exhibit list

to add any of the other documents Plaintiffs seek to add.

According

to the pretrial order, the exhibit lists "shall not be amended except
by Order of the Court to prevent manifest injustice."

The Court

finds that no such manifest injustice exists.
SO ORDERED, this __{~

day of May, 2011.

OR~~~AN~~~S~==~------------­

C~ITED

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2