Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
391
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Post Trial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with Brief In Support by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, Larry R. Ellis, Rutledge A. Griffin, Jr, Robert F. Hatcher, C. Thomas Hopkins, Jr, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Risa Palm, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Neil L. Pruitt, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Larry Walker, Philip A. Wilheit, Sr. (Schaetzel, Stephen)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No.
1:08-CV-1425-ODE
-vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as Georgia State University
President, et al.,
Defendants.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A ONE WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE PROPOSED POST TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW
Now come the above-named Defendants and move for a one (1) week
extension of time, from July 15, 2011 until July 22, 2011, to file proposed post trial
findings of fact and conclusions of law in the above-referenced matter.
At the conclusion of the trial, the Court set July 15, 2011 as the due date for
filing of the post-trial papers. This due date was based on a tentative estimate by the
Court Reporter that the final transcript would be completed on or about June 28, thus
allowing the parties approximately two (2) weeks to complete post-trial papers. As
of July 8, the parties have yet to receive the entire transcript.1 In view thereof, the
Defendants move for a one (1) week extension such that the parties would file posttrial findings and conclusions on Friday, July 22. The Defendants further move for a
corresponding extension of the time for filing a response, until July 29, 2011.
The Defendants have contacted counsel for the Plaintiffs regarding this
motion, and are authorized to state that the Plaintiffs do not oppose the foregoing
motion for a one week extension of time.
It is respectfully submitted that good cause has been shown for the motion. A
proposed order is attached for the convenience of the Court.
Respectfully submitted this 10th day of July, 2011.
SAMUEL S. OLENS
Georgia Bar No. 551540
Attorney General
R. O. LERER
Georgia Bar No. 446962
Deputy Attorney General
DENISE E. WHITING-PACK
Georgia Bar No. 558559
Senior Assistant Attorney General
MARY JO VOLKERT
Georgia Bar No. 728755
Assistant Attorney General
1
The parties have yet to receive at least several volumes (days) of the transcript.
2
KING & SPALDING LLP
/s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel
Stephen M. Schaetzel
Georgia Bar No. 628653
John W. Harbin
Georgia Bar No. 324130
Mary Katherine Bates
Georgia Bar No. 384250
KING & SPALDING LLP
1180 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (404) 572-4600
Facsimile: (404) 572-5100
Email: sschaetzel@kslaw.com
Anthony B. Askew
Georgia Bar No. 025300
Special Assistant Attorney General
McKeon, Meunier, Carlin & Curfman, LLC
817 W. Peachtree Street NW, Suite 900
Atlanta, GA 30308
Phone: 404-645-7709
Fax: 404-645-7707
taskew@m2IPlaw.com
Katrina M. Quicker
Georgia Bar No. 590859
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
999 Peachtree Street, Suite 1000
Atlanta, GA 30309-3915
Telephone: (678) 420-9300
Facsimile: (678) 420-9301
Email: quickerk@ballardspahr.com
Attorneys for Defendants
3
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify, pursuant to L.R. 5.1B and 7.1D of the Northern District of
Georgia, that the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A ONE WEEK
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE POST TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW complies with the font and point selections approved by
the Court in L.R. 5.1B. The foregoing pleading was prepared on a computer using
14-point Times New Roman font.
/s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel______
Stephen M. Schaetzel
Georgia Bar No. 628653
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
et al.,
Civil Action File
No.1:08-CV-1425-ODE
Plaintiffs,
-vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as Georgia State University
President, et al.,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the time for all parties to
file post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law is extended for one (1) week,
until and including July 22, 2011. The time for all parties to file any response is
correspondingly extended until and including July 29, 2011.
SO ORDERED the ____ day of July, 2011.
_____________________________
The Honorable Orinda D. Evans
United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No.
1:08-CV-1425-ODE
-vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as Georgia State University
President, et al.,
Defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that, on this 10th day of July, 2011, I have
electronically filed the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A ONE WEEK
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE POST TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER with the Clerk of
the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send e-mail
notification of such filing to the following attorneys of record:
Edward B. Krugman
krugman@bmelaw.com
Georgia Bar No. 429927
Corey F. Hirokawa
hirokawa@bmelaw.com
Georgia Bar No. 357087
John H. Rains IV
Georgia Bar No. 556052
BONDURANT, MIXSON &
ELMORE, LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street NW
Suite 3900
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (404) 881-4100
Facsimile: (404) 881-4111
R. Bruce Rich
Jonathan Bloom
Randi Singer
Todd D. Larson
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
Telephone: (212) 310-8000
Facsimile: (212) 310-8007
/s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel________
Stephen M. Schaetzel
Georgia Bar No. 628653
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?