Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
435
ORDER GRANTING 434 Motion for Leave to File Reply. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Reply, attached as Exhibit A to the Motion. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 6/22/2012. (anc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS;
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.;
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:08-CV-142S-0DE
MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as President of
Georgia State University; RISA
PALM, in her official capacity
as Senior Vice President for
Academic Affairs and Provost of
Georgia State University; J.L.
ALBERT, in his official
capacity as Georgia State
University Associate Provost
for Information Systems and
Technology; NANCY SEAMANS, in
her official capacity as Dean
of Libraries at Georgia State
University; ROBERT F. HATCHER,
in his official capacity as
Vice Chair of the Board of
Regents of the University
System of Georgia; KENNETH R.
BERNARD, JR., LARRY R. ELLIS,
W. MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR.,
JAMES R. JOLLY, DONALD M.
LEEBERNI JR., WILLIAM NESMITH
JR., DOREEN STILES POITEVINT,
WILLIS J. POTTS, JR., C. DEAN
ALFORD, KESSEL STELLING, JR.,
BENJAMIN J. TARBUTTON, III,
RICHARD L. TUCKER, LARRY
WALKER, RUTLEDGE A. GRIFFIN,
JR., C. THOMAS HOPKINS, JR.,
NEIL L. PRUITT, JR., and PHILIP
A. WILHErT, SR., in their
official capacities as members
of the Board of Regents of the
University System of Georgia,
1
Defendants.
ORDER
This civil action is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for
Leave to File Reply [Doc. 434].
The Motion is GRANTED and deemed
filed.
is
The
Clerk of
the
Court
directed to
file
the
attached as Exhibit A to the Motion [Docs. 434-1 and 434-2] .
SO ORDERED, this
~.
day of June, 2012.
ORINDA D. EVANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Reply,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?