Sanchez Jaquez v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Final Report and Recommendation as the order and opinion of the Court, DISMISSING this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 1/13/2012. (mdy)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
MANUEL RAMON SANCHEZ
JAQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.,
Defendants.
FEDERAL PRISONER
CIVIL RIGHTS
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:11-CV-2622-CC
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Baverman issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with a lawful order of the Court and to advise the Court of his current address.
(Doc. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R.
A district judge must conduct a careful and complete review of a magistrate
judge’s R&R. Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). The
district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [R&R] to
which objection is made,” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), while those portions of the R&R
for which there is no objection are reviewed only for clear error, Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).
AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the
Court ADOPTS the R&R [5] as the opinion of the Court. This action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
January
SO ORDERED this 13THday of
, 2012.
s/ CLARENCE COOPER
_____________________________________
CLARENCE COOPER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?