Rochester v. Dubina et al

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 3 Final Report and Recommendation, this case is DISMISSED; denying 8 Motion for Writ of Mandamus, denying 10 Motion for Hearing. The Clerk is directed not to file any additional papers submitted by the Plaitiff - without full payment of the filing fee - which name as a defendant a federal judge or the President of the United States without receiving the permission of the undersigned. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 3/4/13. (dr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JULIAN E. ROCHESTER, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:13-CV-53-TWT J. F. DUBINA JUDGE, et al., Defendants. ORDER This is a pro se prisoner civil action against several federal judges. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 3] of the Magistrate Judge recommending dismissing the action under 28 U. S. C. § 1915(g). The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. This action is DISMISSED. The Motion for Writ of Mandamus [Doc. 8]and Motion for Hearing [Doc. 10] are DENIED. The Plaintiff is a serial filer of frivolous lawsuits that are illegible, incoherent and delusional. The Clerk is directed not to file any additional papers submitted by the Plaintiff – without full payment of the filing fee – which name as a defendant a federal judge or the President of the United States without receiving the permission of the undersigned. T:\ORDERS\13\Rochester\r&r.wpd SO ORDERED, this 4 day of March, 2013. /s/Thomas W. Thrash THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. United States District Judge T:\ORDERS\13\Rochester\r&r.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?