Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al

Filing 15

MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response Either by Answer or Motion to Plaintiffs' Complaint and Proposed Order by Deborah Aderhold, Brook Davidson, Pinkie Toomer. (Orland, Devon)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Christopher Inniss and Shelton Stroman; Rayshawn Chandler and Avery Chandler; Michael Bishop And Johnny Shane Thomas; and Jennifer Sisson, on behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Deborah Aderhold, in her official capacity; Brook Davidson, in her official capacity, and Judge Pinkie Toomer in her official capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action Number 1:14-CV-01180-WSD CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE EITHER BY ANSWER OR MOTION TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT COME NOW, all Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, and hereby move for an extension of time of thirty (30) days in which to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Defendants’ response is currently due on June 21, 2014 and Defendants seek an extension until July 21, 2014. The undersigned has conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel and is authorized to state that Plaintiffs’ counsel has no objection to a thirty day (30) extension of time. No party will be prejudiced as a result of the extension of time requested. A proposed Order is attached for the Court’s convenience. 1 Respectfully submitted, SAMUEL S. OLENS Attorney General 551540 KATHLEEN M. PACIOUS Deputy Attorney General 558555 Nels Peterson Solicitor General 101074 /s/ Devon Orland 554301 Senior Asst. Attorney General Counsel for Defendant Aderhold /s/Frank E. Jenkins, III Georgia Bar Number: 390550 /s/Robert L. Walker Georgia Bar Number: 554985 (770) 387-1373 – Tel (770) 387-2396 – Fax Email: fjenkins@ga-lawyers.pro Email: rwalker@ga-lawyers.pro Counsel for Defendant Davidson /s/Kaye W. Burwell Georgia Bar Number: 775060 Deputy County Attorney Office of the Fulton County Attorney 141 Pryor Street, S.W., Suite 4038 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Kaye.Burwell@fultoncountyga.gov Counsel for Judge Toomer 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date I have electronically filed the foregoing CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND and Draft Order using the CM/ECF system which will automatically send electronic mail notification of such filing to counsel of record as follows: Tara Borelli William Custer Jennifer Odom Jennifer Dempsey Luke Lantta I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the following non-CM/ECF participants: NONE Done this 27th day of May, 2014. /s/ Devon Orland Devon Orland Georgia Bar No. 554301 Department of Law, State of Georgia 40 Capitol Square, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30334-1300 Telephone: (404) 463-8850 Facsimile: (404) 651-5304 E-mail: dorland@law.ga.gov 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Christopher Inniss and Shelton Stroman; Rayshawn Chandler and Avery Chandler; Michael Bishop And Johnny Shane Thomas; and Jennifer Sisson, on behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Deborah Aderhold, in her official capacity; Brook Davidson, in her official capacity, and Judge Pinkie Toomer in her official capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action Number 1:14-CV-01180-WSD ORDER THIS MATTER coming before the Court on Defendants’ Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, due notice to the parties and the Court being advised of the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall have an additional thirty (30) days, up to and including July 21 2014, in which to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED, this ____ day of _______________, 2014. 4 ____________________________ Hon. William Duffy United States District Judge 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?