Adan v. All

Filing 20

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Return Money. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 04/01/2016. (dfb)

Download PDF
refund of $72, the Court has no statutory authority to grant Plaintiff’s request. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner is required to pay all installments of a filing fee until it is paid in full, and there is no exception for a dismissed lawsuit. See Holt v. Bengton, 161 F.3d 17 (10th Cir. 1998). The Motion for Refund is denied. (November 19, 2014, Order at 3 n.1). Plaintiff now appears to renew his request for a return of money taken from his prison account. Plaintiff’s request is denied for the same reasons the Court denied his Motion to Refund. The Court does not have statutory authority to grant Plaintiff’s request, and he is required to pay all installments of his filing fee until it is paid in full. See Holt v. Bengton, 161 F.3d 17 (10th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Return Money [19] is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2016. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?