Glees v. Davis Express, Inc.

Filing 23

OPINION AND ORDER that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to obey a lawful Order of the Court, pursuant to L.R. 41.3 A.(2), N.D. Ga. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 11/19/2014. (anc)

Download PDF
prosecution if a plaintiff fails to obey a lawful Order of the Court. L.R. 41.3 A.(2), N.D. Ga. Plaintiff failed to respond by the deadline set by the Court’s October 16, 2014, Order. See id. Because Plaintiff failed to obey a lawful Order of the Court, the Court is required to dismiss this action without prejudice. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice is GRANTED. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to obey a lawful Order of the Court, pursuant to L.R. 41.3 A.(2), N.D. Ga. 1 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint with prejudice is DENIED. A dismissal with prejudice “is not appropriate unless the district court finds both that a clear record of delay or willful misconduct exists, and that lesser sanctions are inadequate to correct such conduct.” Stephenson v. Warden, Doe, 554 F. App’x 835, 837 (11th Cir. 2014). There is no evidence of a clear record of delay or willful misconduct, or evidence that lesser sanctions are inadequate to correct Plaintiff’s conduct. The Complaint is thus required to be dismissed without prejudice. 2 SO ORDERED this 19th day of November 2014. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?