Ramirez v. Medlin

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 3 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 5/18/2015. (adg)

Download PDF
Petitioner did not comply with the Magistrate Judge’s October 23, 2014, Order. On December 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss this action for Petitioner’s failure to comply with the October 23, 2014, Order. (R&R at 1). Petitioner did not file any objections to the R&R. II. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). A district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). With respect to those findings and recommendations to which a party has not asserted objections, the district judge must conduct a plain error review of the record. United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). B. Analysis As Petitioner has not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations for plain error. See 2 Slay 714 F.2d at 1095. The Magistrate Judge found that Petitioner failed to comply with the October 23, 2014, Order, and properly recommended that the Court dismiss this action. See LR 41.3(A)(2), NDGa. The Court finds no plain error in Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation. See Slay, 714 F.2d at 1095. III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill’s Final Report and Recommendation [3] is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2015. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?